- Comms
- Law
- Medic
- News
- Opinion
- Threat Watch
- Training
- Warrior Tools
- Accessories
- Ammo
- Body Armor
- Books
- Clothing
- Commo
- Gear
- Handguns
- Holsters
- Knives
- Long Guns
- ACC
- Accuracy International
- Barrett
- Benelli
- Beretta
- Blaser
- Bushmaster
- Custom
- CZ
- Desert Tactical Arms
- DPMS
- FN
- Forums
- HK
- IWI
- Kel-Tec Long Guns
- LaRue
- LWRC
- McMillan
- Mosin Nagant
- Mossberg
- Para
- Remington
- Rock River Arms
- Ruger Long Guns
- Sabre Defense
- Sako
- SIG Sauer
- SKS
- Smith & Wesson Long Guns
- Springfield
- Styer
- Weatherby
- Wilson Combat
- Winchester
- Magazines
- Maintenance
- Navigation
- Optics
- Sights
- Tech
- Warriors
Archive for category Threat Watch
Interpol no longer subject to U.S. Constitution
Posted by Jack Sinclair in News, Threat Watch on 20/Jan/2010 23:25
The head of a civil liberties organization is concerned about an executive order signed by President Obama last month which allows an international law enforcement agency to have jurisdiction in the United States without being subject to the U.S. Constitution.
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Security/Default.aspx?id=860278
Why is the mainstream media burying this story?
Posted by Jack Sinclair in Threat Watch on 20/Jan/2010 21:42
What story is too intimidating, too controversial even for outspoken broadcasters like Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck to cover?
Here’s a story that makes Watergate look like a parking violation by comparison – and yet the media has buried it.
Why? Because of the Muslim Mafia. Does that sound over the top? Far-fetched? Inflammatory?
There is a genuine threat to the First Amendment by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), “the Muslim Brotherhood’s public-relations factory” (Joseph Farah).
CAIR is trying to suppress freedom of the press in America by attempting to block the publication of an expose´ of CAIR by authors P. David Gaubatz and Paul Sperry.
The book is “Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America,” and not one news agency in America, other than World Net Daily, has had the integrity to tell you the truth about CAIR and its agenda.
To quote Joseph Farah, of World Net Daily, “CAIR and its terrorist-loving friends have millions of dollars in funding, and they use it to intimidate the media. CAIR has gone into court and sued heroic investigative reporter David Gaubatz as well as his son Chris (who went undercover in CAIR), to send a message to others. Their message: Tell the truth about CAIR and we will crush you financially. These are the type of tactics used by thugs.”
“Author Gaubatz’s son penetrated CAIR’s inner circle, posing as an intern, and he ferreted out thousands of pages of documents headed for the shredder. The documents tell a devastating story of lies and links to terrorists.”
CAIR wants these documents destroyed, so they can keep their deceit a secret, so they sued investigators Dave and Chris Gaubatz. Just a few things Dave and Chris uncovered:
– Which politicians are given money by CAIR.
– How Capitol Hill staffers are strategically placed by CAIR.
– Why FBI bonuses are paid to agents who are nice to CAIR.
– Why our government is afraid to reveal what they really know about CAIR.
– How CAIR has compromised our intelligence systems.
The movie Hollywood doesn’t want you to see
Posted by Jack Sinclair in Threat Watch on 20/Jan/2010 21:16
This movie is so controversial that “The Detroit Free Press refused a paid deal to distribute free educational copies of the acclaimed DVD to its subscribers.”
Even though it had been “awarded Best Feature Film at the Liberty Film Festival and a Special Jury Award at the WorldFest Houston.”
“Using actual video footage from Arabic TV rarely seen in the West, [the movie] “Obsession” documents the calls for world domination and global jihad made by Islamic leaders daily. No need to read between the lines here—their message is loud and clear.”
“The undercover footage shows suicide bomber initiations, the indoctrination of young children into hate and violence, secret jihad meetings and public celebrations of 9/11.”
“And yet, “Obsession” has become “the movie Hollywood doesn’t want you to see,” due to the fact that despite overwhelming public interest, no distributor was willing to pick up the film for release because of its controversial nature.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMLJJEDDDGc
Radical Islam’s Vision for America
Posted by Jack Sinclair in Threat Watch on 20/Jan/2010 21:07
“Abdul Alim Musa, an imam in Washington D.C., … boldly states, “On our website we talk about the Islamic State of North America by 2050.”
“Can the United States of America as we know it crumble from within in just a few short years?
The stunning possibility is more than just a dream to some enemies of the greatest nation on Earth. It is a fast-becoming probability.”
“We all know about terrorism. This is the war you don’t know about,” declares “The Third Jihad: Radical Islam’s Vision for America,”
“The Third Jihad,” narrated by devout Muslim American Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser, opens with the following statement: “This is not a film about Islam. It is about the threat of radical Islam. Only a small percentage of the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims are radical. This film is about them.”
Movie trailer here:
Comment on trailer:
“I live in the UK and I’m sure U all know whats happening over here.
I’m really worried that they are taking over and theres NOTHING we can do. They play the race card at every turn, make NO attempt to integrate and treat the hosts with no respect while DEMANDING.â€
Eaten are the Peace Makers
Posted by Jack Sinclair in Threat Watch on 20/Jan/2010 20:49
In 1835, a few hundred miles east of New Zealand, an island society with “a tradition of resolving disputes peacefully” met a brutal and bloody end because they decided not to fight back but “to offer peace, friendship, and a division of resources”.
The Moriori people preferred to negotiate and compromise. However, the Maori, armed with guns, clubs and axes, were not interested in diplomacy. Hundreds of Maori poured off their ships onto Moriori turf and attacked before any peace offering was given. Even though the Moriori far outnumbered their attackers, they chose not to resist, so they were slaughtered.
According to a survivor, “[The Maori] commenced to kill us like sheep. . . . [We] were terrified, fled to the bush, concealed ourselves in holes underground, and in any place to escape our enemies. It was of no avail; we were discovered and killed—men, women, and children indiscriminately.â€
Over the next few days, the Maori “killed hundreds of Moriori, cooked and ate many of the bodies”.
And what was the Maori perspective on this event?
“We took possession. . . in accordance with our customs and we caught all the people. Not one escaped. Some ran away from us, these we killed, and others we killed—but what of that? It was in accordance with our custom.â€
Question: What is the custom of our enemy? Have they decided to “take possession”? Are we foolish to think that an offer of peace, friendship, and a division of resources is going do any good?
True, fighting back is not the only answer, sometimes good things are accomplished through negotiation. But if you make a choice like the Moriori did, and you are facing an enemy like the Maori, your lack of resistance will only be seen as weakness and you will be killed like sheep – along with your women and children.
(quotes from the book, “Guns, Germs and Steel†by Jared Diamond)
I wonder how the story of the Moriori might have been different if they’d responded more like the Lumbee?
(The Lumbee were a small tribe of Indians in the United States that “…had always considered themselves indian, but were classified and treated as descendants of blacks.”)
In 1958, in Robeson County, South Carolina, the Lumbee rallied their men and resisted an attack by the KKK.
The end result when the fight was over?
“The Klan ceased to exist in Robeson County until 1984.”
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/1/17/124611/522
‘At last there is someone who dares to say what millions of people think’
Posted by Jack Sinclair in Threat Watch on 20/Jan/2010 19:57
“If a politician is not allowed to criticise an ideology anymore this means that we are lost, and it will lead to the end of our freedom.” Geert Wilders, on trial for “insulting Muslims”, speaking out against Islamisation and for his film, Fitna.
[He] “was banned from Britain last February on the grounds that he would “threaten community harmony and therefore public securityâ€
But who was the threat to harmony and security? Wilders for expressing his views? Or was the real threat those Muslims who threatened violence because they felt “insulted”?
“The Dutch government has chosen to censor his [Wilders] film and prosecute him for hate crimes. Decide for yourself if this film promotes hate, or is simply a educational film about Islam.”
Question: is it “hate” to speak out against ideologies that promote violent intolerance? Is it hate to resist people who use threats of violence to bully others into remaining silent? Is it hate to resist those who use fear to keep people from talking about ideologies they find toxic and dangerous?
Stratfor Security
Posted by Brian in Threat Watch on 19/Jan/2010 18:07
Stratfor is a global intelligence network and here is their take on airline security.