- Comms
- Law
- Medic
- News
- Opinion
- Threat Watch
- Training
- Warrior Tools
- Accessories
- Ammo
- Body Armor
- Books
- Clothing
- Commo
- Gear
- Handguns
- Holsters
- Knives
- Long Guns
- ACC
- Accuracy International
- Barrett
- Benelli
- Beretta
- Blaser
- Bushmaster
- Custom
- CZ
- Desert Tactical Arms
- DPMS
- FN
- Forums
- HK
- IWI
- Kel-Tec Long Guns
- LaRue
- LWRC
- McMillan
- Mosin Nagant
- Mossberg
- Para
- Remington
- Rock River Arms
- Ruger Long Guns
- Sabre Defense
- Sako
- SIG Sauer
- SKS
- Smith & Wesson Long Guns
- Springfield
- Styer
- Weatherby
- Wilson Combat
- Winchester
- Magazines
- Maintenance
- Navigation
- Optics
- Sights
- Tech
- Warriors
Posts Tagged second amendment
Obama bans nearly a million American-made rifles?
Posted by Jack Sinclair in Law, News on 17/Sep/2010 21:32
Did you know that Barack Obama has banned nearly a million American made rifles?
Nearly a million rifles.
Banned by Barack Obama and his anti-gun cronies.
In an executive order the Obama Administration has secretly blocked the re-importation of American made M-1 Garand and Carbine rifles being stored in South Korea.
These rifles were used by the US military during the Korean War and left there after the war was over.
With one stroke of his pen, he by-passed the legislative process and banned nearly a million American made rifles by executive fiat.
These rifles were made in America, by Americans and used by American soldiers to defend freedom on foreign shores and are greatly sought after by American shooters and collectors.
Now State Department officials claim these antique, collector rifles could be used to commit crimes.
Watch the video here, and sign the petition if this is important to you:
BREAKING: Firearm Regulation Hearing Set for the 14th
The U.S. Senate has scheduled a hearing for the 14th of September titled “Firearms in Commerce: Assessing the Need for Reform in the Federal Regulatory Process”
Does that sound good to anyone? If you live in or near D.C. I urge you to sit in on this hearing and report back what was discussed. It sounds to me like another improper use of the “commerce clause”.
Additional Info: The hearing was called by the chairman of the committee Senator Leahy of Vermont.
President Forbids Sale of Korean War Rifles
This story comes on the heels of the EPA trying to ban lead ammunition. The South Korean government is trying to sell thousands of M1s and M1 carbines to U.S. citizens to raise money. Gun control advocates don’t want the transfers to occur:
“Guns that can take high-capacity magazines are a threat to public safety,” said Dennis Henigan of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. “Even though they are old, these guns could deliver a great amount of firepower. So I think the Obama administration’s concerns are well-taken.”
The State Department’s excuse was:
“The transfer of such a large number of weapons — 87,310 M1 Garands and 770,160 M1 Carbines — could potentially be exploited by individuals seeking firearms for illicit purposes,” the spokesman told FoxNews.com.
The problem is the federal government assumes the worst about the people who will buy these weapons. I doubt a single person who purchases one of these rifles will commit a crime with it. My guess would be that most will be bought by vets who actually fought in the war and collectors.
EPA Denies Petition on Ammunition Ban
From: EPA
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency today denied a petition calling for a ban on the production and distribution of lead hunting ammunition. EPA sent a letter to the petitioners explaining the rejection – that letter can be found here: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/pubs/sect21.html
Steve Owens, EPA assistant administrator for the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, issued the following statement on the agency’s decision:
“EPA today denied a petition submitted by several outside groups for the agency to implement a ban on the production and distribution of lead hunting ammunition. EPA reached this decision because the agency does not have the legal authority to regulate this type of product under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) – nor is the agency seeking such authority.
Ban of all traditional forms of ammunition? Toxic Substance Control Act of 1976
Posted by Jack Sinclair in Law, News on 29/Aug/2010 16:06
Barack Obama has teamed up with liberal special interest groups to use the un-elected bureaucrats in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to ban all traditional forms of ammunition.
That’s right, Obama and his cronies are trying to ban ALL your ammo.
By using the Toxic Substance Control Act of 1976, they want to ban all hunting, target and self-defense ammo that contains lead, no matter how little.
Make no mistake — this is gun control at its worst.
Since your actions have stopped their plans to pass ammo and gun bans so far in congress, they’re using the old end-run.
Obama and his anti-gun cronies in the EPA know that by banning all but the most expensive ammo, they’ve effectively banned your guns in all but name.
And they’ve certainly destroyed the red-blooded American past time of just plain shooting.
To make matters worse, the anti-gunners are hoping to sneak this attack on our Second Amendment Rights through as a bureaucratic rule change.
They know that when they introduce gun control as legislation that gun owners like you and I have tremendous grassroots power.
The anti-gun lobby knows that is you keep the heat on congress most members of Congress will be afraid of angering gun owners so close to an election.
So they’re simply bypassing the democratic, legislative process all together by counting on bureaucrats in the EPA to do their anti-gun dirty work.
Think this doesn’t apply to you? Think again.
The goal of this rule change is simple: drive the price of ammo through the roof for all but law enforcement and the military.
Virtually all hunting, target and self-defense ammo has some lead components.
They’re trying to disarm us one bullet at a time.
Petition here:
They Tried To Ban Your Ammo!
The EPA within a matter of hours today went from taking requests about banning lead ammo to completely rejecting the idea.
The EPA had planned to solicit public responses to the petition for two months, but this afternoon issued a statement rejecting a 100-page request from the Center for Biological Diversity, the American Bird Conservancy, and three other groups for a ban on lead bullets, shot, and fishing sinkers. The agency is still considering what to do about sinkers.
Vigilance is required if we are to maintain our liberties.
Open Carry: in the states where it’s legal, is Open Carry Provacative or Positive?
Posted by Jack Sinclair in News, Opinion on 24/Aug/2010 17:07
“OpenCarry.org was founded in 2004 by then Virginia residents John Pierce and Mike Stollenwerk to be a pro-gun Internet community focused on the right to openly carry properly holstered handguns in daily American life.
The idea to establish OpenCarry.org arose in Virginia where state law (now repealed effective July 1, 2010) actually required open carry at restaurants serving alcohol. In July, 2004, Fairfax County, VA police briefly appeared at the Reston, VA Champps restaurant to investigate a 911 call about patrons openly carrying holstered handguns. Mike was at Champps eating a steak and drinking a coke that night while openly carrying and he describes the police response as something Cesar might have said: “They came, they saw, they left.”
But then the Washington Post ran a series of very critical articles and scathing editorials attacking the practice of open carry. Reacting to this “news” coverage, gun owners in Virginia and across the United States naturally wondered about the law of open carry in the fifty states – but gun rights Internet resources at that time focused almost exclusively on “concealed” carry. Research soon revealed that state legislatures and courts have largely protected open carry rights since the time of our nation’s founding, and that most states require no permit to open carry.
So thanks to the Washington Post’s “sky is falling” hoplophobic coverage of the Champps non-incident, OpenCarry.org was born!”
http://opencarry.org/index.html
In addition to being an invaluable “starting point” legal resource and discussion forum for gun owners, OpenCarry.org has grown to become the social networking portal for the open carry movement. Tens of thousands of “OCDO” registered members have already made a difference in their communities! Over the last 6 years, the open carry of handguns has become much more common and less controversial as open carriers’ friends, neighbors and local law enforcement discover that open carry is legal and wholesome. In fact a recent FBI report essentially concludes that criminals don’t open carry handguns.
Anthropologist Charles Springwood sums it up nicely when he commented that open carriers are trying to “naturalize the presence of guns, which means that guns become ordinary, omnipresent, and expected. Over time, the gun becomes a symbol of ordinary personhood.”
OpenCarry.org believes that “a right unexercised, is a right lost,” and increasingly gun owners are agreeing – it’s time gun carry comes out of the closet across America!
Having a gun does not = being prepared
Posted by Jack Sinclair in News on 22/Aug/2010 13:34
Yankeeprepper talks about Run & Gun, being prepared and Freedom of Speech
NEW lawsuit filed over Chicago’s gun limits
Posted by Jack Sinclair in Law, News on 17/Aug/2010 22:10
“Only months after the Supreme Court struck down the city’s restrictions on guns, Chicago is the target of a new lawsuit because it now requires gun owners to practice at gun ranges but bans the ranges themselves.”
“While the city has adopted new regulations that make it legal to own handguns,” said Alan Gottlieb, executive vice president of the Second Amendment Foundation, “they have crafted this new ordinance to make it virtually impossible for prospective gun owners to meet all legal requirements unless they travel outside the city for mandatory training.
The new ordinance prohibits public gun ranges inside the city yet the city demands that handgun owners get at least one hour of range training time.”
What is the best defensive pistol to carry?
Posted by Jack Sinclair in News on 17/Aug/2010 17:52
by Carteach
“A defensive carry weapon must work, must be there, and be big enough to do the job at hand.
My opinion? The largest reliable pistol you can carry, comfortably concealed all day, that is the way to go.
Supreme Court: Second Amendment doesn’t only apply to a well-regulated militia, but to individual citizens.
Posted by Jack Sinclair in Opinion on 6/Aug/2010 17:35
By Tamara Dietrich
For many of us, the Supreme Court’s finding that Americans have a fundamental right to own guns for self-defense in their own homes wasn’t ground-breaking — it was common sense.
Outright community bans on firearms or handguns, such as those in Chicago and the District of Columbia, both struck down by the high court in separate challenges, were well-intentioned but wrong. And ineffective — gun violence rates soared in those communities.
Interestingly, last week was the first time justices ruled that the Second Amendment doesn’t only apply to a well-regulated militia, but to individual citizens.
Count me among those not surprised at the decision, but at the 233 years it took to get it.
A Beginners Guide To Concealed Carry Revised
Posted by Jack Sinclair in News on 2/Aug/2010 19:06
“This rig has served me well and has come about after a long process of trial and error. The Glock 26 with crimson trace laser, milt sparks versimax 2 holster, ted blocker belt and blackhawk cqc magazine / flashlight carrier is an excellent system for most users.”
Elena Kagan will be a solid vote against the Second Amendment if confirmed
Posted by Jack Sinclair in Law, Opinion on 30/Jul/2010 17:42
by Luke O’Dell, Director of Operations, National Association for Gun Rights“Just a few days ago, Senator Graham (R – SC) voted with the gun-grabbers on the Judiciary committee for confirmation of Elena “not sympathetic to your gun rights†Kagan to the Supreme Court.
That kind of defeatist pandering makes me sick, especially when it’s clear that Kagan will bring an ardently anti-gun agenda to the Supreme Court.
Elena Kagan will be a solid vote against the Second Amendment if confirmed, but they don’t want the public to see that for themselves.
We know that:
– Kagan said she is “not sympathetic†to the right to keep and bear arms.
– Kagan supports gun licensing and registration.
– Kagan dismisses the notion that the Second Amendment deserves “unlimited protection against governmental regulation.â€
– Kagan personally drafted an executive order for Bill Clinton that banned the importation of semi-automatic firearms.
On top of another Graham betrayal of conservatives, Indiana Republican Richard Lugar is planning to join Graham in support of Kagan’s nomination.
Make no mistake Lugar and Graham are complicit in selling out YOUR Second Amendment rights.”
http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/hostedemail/email.htm?h=cc21ad0c9d870c2b2fe42435b97dbbf9&CID=6676914293&ch=96FB60EFEC0F61A732859CF4545DF55C
Gun Rights Blog Sued for Infringement
From: WorldNetDaily
A popular blog that has kept citizens abreast of how Americans successfully defend themselves from crime by being armed has been suspended while its organizers deal with a copyright infringement claim from a newspaper, the blog itself has announced.
David Burnett said in a statement his Armed Citizen site is closed for now, and its future will depend on what happens in the case.
The site was targeted in a federal court lawsuit filed by Righthaven LLC, which apparently is working on behalf of the Las Vegas Review-Journal.
